Everyone with even mild and uninterested interest in UFOs is completely desperate for someone who seems right to weigh the matter. Ideally, we want one of the brain geniuses NASA in our corner. We want something in white work with the NASA logo embroidered on the pocket pocket to take us firmly (still warmly) with our hands and say, "At home, you can be right about foreigners. This man is here and his name is Dr. Silvano Colombano of the NASA Ames Research Center.
A Colombian has come into our lives this week due to a white paper he published earlier this year Reddit. That paper, titled New assumptions to guide SETI Research, suggests that scientists revive their assumptions about the likelihood of an alien contact, based on our newest understanding of technology and the universe.
A Colombian affirms that the recent discovery of planetary systems as old as 10.4 billion of 11.2 billion years (when we are only fifty billion years old) should reward how we can judge the ultimate limit of potential with technology, especially when The scientific method has only really been a great thing here for 500 years.
Starting from here, Colombia says that it may be time, we have questioned some basic assumptions about extraordinary intelligence life – these assumptions are:
- Interstellar trips are impossible or very unlikely
- Radio waves continue to be the main form of communication for thousands or millions of years.
- Intelligent civilizations would be based on carbon life
- We were not and are not visited
A Colombian challenged the first assumption saying we simply do not know enough to rule it:
Clearly distance and energy are insurmountable problems for the technologies we have and ours current understanding of physics. Still we are able to distinguish the possibilities of achieving much greater understanding and control of matter-energy and space-time. Even if the light of the light is still an unquestionable barrier, for about thousands of years civilizations may be likely to make interstellar trips, in what suppositions we make about the forms of life that they will form.
He takes the second by suggesting that what they use could be beyond our ken, and also that even if they use a radius, we may not be able to disconnect what they are sending.
Regarding the carbon life of carbon based, Colombian says, looking at where we go with computers, carbon based could only be the start in terms of the evolution of life form:
After only 50 years of computer development we have talked about "super-intelligence" and we quickly become symbiotic with computer power. . . . I simply want to show the fact that the intelligence we could find, and that we might choose to find us (if not) could not be produced by carbon based on organisms like us. How might that change the above assumptions about interstellar travel? Our typical conditions of life would no longer be a limitation (although even these could be dealt with with multi-ethnic missions or rejected animation), and the size of the "researcher" may be very much above an intelligent entity.
I think we can all agree, that is, like hell.
Finally, a Colombian says that during the great amount of nonsense in UFO reports and the seemingly improbable of extraterrestrial visitors has kept sciences from the UFO research, it should not:
It seems to me that SETI ignored (at least officially) the possible importance of UFO phenomena for three reasons: 1) the supposition of extremely low likelihood of interest in travel, 2) The very high likelihood of deceit, erroneous perceptions or even psychotic events in phenomena of UFO and 3) Generally avoiding the subject of the scientific community. I think the access to the scientific community, instead, is very similar to what SETI did so far: to find the signal in the noise.
In the great amount of "noise" in UFO reporting, there can be "signals" however small that indicate some phenomena that can not be explained or denied. If we adopt a new set of assumptions about the ways in which we can find higher intelligence and technology, some of these phenomena could fit specific hypotheses, and we could start a serious investigation.
Hole, yes. Hell i yes !!!
The great recommendations of a Colombian are that the search of extraterrestrial life moves in a direction that is considered "speculative physics"Where physicists begin with our current understanding of physics but"with some will to tighten possibilities about the nature of space-time and energy"Sent in the mix, and who is studying UFOS on the ground as a serious investigation, only one with"with very low
signal to noise report".
You can read all this paper here, it's relatively short and easy to bring in, even if you are not a humorous tournament.