Wednesday , August 10 2022

The Angry Birds Movie 2 Review



[ad_1]

In a summer where box office hits and misses, when it comes to giving an audience what they wanted or expected, The Angry Birds Movie 2 is almost exactly what you would expect. Although fans of the first movie will likely be satisfied with the sequel and there is nothing fundamentally wrong with The Angry Birds Movie 2, it is unlikely that anyone who did not intend to watch it will change their mind and buy a ticket. is that if you are an adult taking a child to it, it will not be an unpleasant experience. You were probably sitting through worse. Would you recommend someone to go and see it without kids? Probably not. Another good thing is that at 96 minutes long, one minute shorter than The Angry Birds Movie, it still didn't make its welcome.

Director Thurop Van Orman has previously worked on Powerpuff Girls, Adventure Time, and Home: Adventures with Tip & Oh, and he brought some of his flair from those projects and applied them here, taking what the first movie featured and giving it a go his own touch. . But while there are few flowers here for adults, this is a lot like a children's movie.

What was interesting to see was how the guys in the cast were reacting to the movie. The younger members of the audience lauded the awkwardness and the gentle destruction. However, the guys at the older end of the spectrum, those who were probably more in the previous demographic when the first movie appeared, seemed amused but less responsive and in love with what they saw. The first sang with songs on the soundtrack and repeated a funny dialogue they had just heard while the latter did not. Some of the older children had their phones and generally seemed more interested in what was happening outside the theater than in what was developing inside.

Every video game in development (almost)

The plot of The Angry Birds Movie 2 is a little deeper than that of the first movie – though deeper is relative. This time Red, Chuck, and Bomb (again voiced by Jason Sudeikis, Josh Gad and Danny McBride respectively) have to collaborate with Leonard (voiced by Bill Hader) and the rest of the pigs when they find out someone with an advanced weapon threatens to destroy both their island homes. As I said, deeper is relative.

As with The Angry Birds Movie, there is a lot of cunning and sight. These raise the trifle, but this one has more Looney Tunes. There are many new characters added to the mix, and some of them make their presence felt most notably Silver (voiced by Rachel Bloom), Courtney (voiced by Awkwafina), and Garry (voiced by Sterling K. Brown). All of them, as characters and voice actors, bring something different and add value to the storytelling and some meat to the bones of the film. But even with all of these roles and changes, The Angry Birds Movie 2 still feels overly derivative and like you've seen these tropes and beats before.

video upload ...

The villain of the piece, Zeta, is voiced by Leslie Jones. She does a solid job, but the material she works with is not as strong as some of the other characters – it's not her fault. She gives it everything she got, but I kept thinking how much I prefer to hear her in a more restrained, adult-animated movie, just letting it crumble. She is at her best when she lets out. That said, compare her role and performance with the mean-spiritedness in this family movie and Zeta is one of the better ones.

In the movie there are a handful of subplots, and there is a message or two, including overcoming differences with people that you may disagree with to try to find some common ground and work together. It's not preachy or set too thick so everyone's involved for that – the focus is firmly on the fun.

[ad_2]
Source link