Monday , August 8 2022

Five graphics cards that you will not buy and five alternatives



[ad_1]

The general consumer graphics cards market is now more saturated than ever, a reality that, on the one hand, is positive, because you have More to choose from, but that also has a negative side, and that is It is more difficult to decide what model to buy

We have not reached this situation by accident. Much of the saturation of the market card Healing is a direct legacy of the explosion of the kriptouruna bubble. Buying graphic cards at a good price was an odyssey, the large guys in the sector stopped taking away the situation and ended up growing production to unthinkable levels that generated acne levels that are not yet digested today.

I can sound exaggerated, but not far from the reality. We are in total 2019 and there is still a good availability of graphics cards GTX 1060 and GTX 1070, and this NVIDIA-two series over both, the GTX 1660 and RTX 2060. With AMD, the problem is the same at its base, but it is less obvious, since the company of Sunnyvale has not yet completed a complete renovation of its medium range, so the Radeon RX 570 and Radeon RX 580 they still do not have direct descendants.

Some retailers already show clear symptoms of stokid cleaning, but the only models that are actually emptied are the GTX 1080 and the GTX 1080 TiTwo graphics cards that did not have a great deal in the world of encryption, and that, therefore, they were never bought on a large scale. NVIDIA was aware of that, and therefore did not raise a product drastically.

In the case of AMD, the Radeon RX 570 and RX 580 availability is still very good, and thanks to this accumulation of stocks, as a result of the decline in interest around a cipher, we could see liquids and offers with very attractive prices.

It is clear that there is still a certain instability in the graphics card market, and that a successful purchase of a specific model can end as an odyssey. So we wanted to update our guide graphics card that is not worth buying and to accompany five alternatives that make. In order for everyone to find something according to their needs and preferences, we will provide the options of both manufacturers, ie NVIDIA and AMD, unless it is impossible or is very forced.

I remind you that a few days ago we also released a specialty with Five processors that are not worth buying and five alternatives that yes, a guide that I believe can be very useful and that perfectly complements the article we have today. Without more, we'll throw us completely into the pond, do you accompany us? Well, let's go!

Graphics cards that are not worth buying

1.- GeForce GTX 1070

I was one of the best graphics cards of the previous generation thanks to its best price presentation. The increase in brute force brought by the Pascal architecture was also accompanied by a significant improvement in efficiency that allowed this graphic card No problems exceed the performance of the GTX 980 Ti also reducing consumption significantly.

Time does not happen in vain. The arrival of Turing and the preservation of absurd high prices to try to clean up shares reducing maximum losses left the GTX 1070 in position sensignifa. It costs almost the same as RTX 2060, about 330 euros on average, but gives less than it and lacks tensile core and RT-core. It's bad to buy clearly, because it has a very high cost for what it offers and for what we can find at the moment in the market.

Specifications of the GTX 1070:

  • GP104 GPU at 16 nm.
  • 1,920 shades at 1.506 MHz-1.683 MHz, normal and peat mode.
  • 120 texture units.
  • 64 rasterized units.
  • 256-bit bus
  • 8GB of GDDR5 memory at 8 GHz.
  • 8-pin connector.
  • 150 watts TDP

Alternative option that is worth buying: The best alternative in strict sense, without spending much of the price of the GTX 1070, is the RTX 2060, a graphic card that we can receive from 309.95 euros and offers almost the same performance as GTX 1080, but with the advantage of having a DLSS support and a radiator, and also the greatest support at the driver level, as it is the most modern model based on Turing.

Specifications of the RTX 2060:

  • GPU TU106 at 12 nm.
  • 1,920 shades.
  • GPU at 1.365 MHz-1.680 MHz.
  • 120 texture units.
  • 48 rasterized units.
  • 240 Theoretical cores for artificial intelligence.
  • 30 RT-cores for tracks.
  • 192-bit bus
  • 6 GDDR6 at 14 GHz.
  • 8 connector of power.
  • 160 watts TDP

In case you want an AMD alternative without exceeding 300 euros Radeon RX Vega 56 Optioning is an interesting option, provided that it does not exceed 280 euros, but rather, it prefers the RTX 2060 for a price-yield-effectiveness relationship.

2.-Radeon RX Vega 64

Cardi is a graphic card that has never sacrificed really good value. The Radeon RX Vega 56 It has always been a better choice, and according to price-yield and consumption, and this reality has not changed.

We can still find units of various mounters with prices around about 420 euros best. Bit is an overwhelming figure considering what it offers and what we can buy now with that money, so definitely I am one of the worst graphics cards that we can buy in terms of quality-priced.

Specifics of the Radeon RX Vega 64

  • Vega 10 XT GPU at 14 nm.
  • 4.096 shades at 1,247 MHz-1,556 MHz, normal and peat-mode.
  • 256 texture units.
  • 64 rasterized units.
  • 2.048-bit bus.
  • 8 GB of HBM2 at 1890 MHz.
  • I use two 8-pin connectors.
  • TDP of 295 watts.

Alternative option that is worth buying: la Radeon RX 5700 XT I am the best choice. This graphics card exceeds the NVIDIA RTX 2070, has a price of 429,90 euros and presents more content consumption. With this, we can play in problem solving in 1440p and even enjoy a good experience in 4K if we reduce the graphic quality to high or very high levels, according to the requirements of each game.

Specifications of the Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Graphic core Navi 10 XT in 7 nm.
  • 2.560 shades At 1,605 MHz basic frequencies, 1,755 MHz mode mode and 1,905 MHz in peat mode.
  • 160 texture units.
  • 64 rasterized units.
  • 256-bit bus
  • Support PCIE Gen 4.
  • Two powerful connectors, one with 6 pins and the other with 8 pins.
  • TDP of 225 watts.

In case we want an alternative to NVIDIA, what we can find at that price is the RTX 2060 Super, a graphic card that remains slightly under the Radeon RX 5700 XT (about 4% less than average) and we can reach less than 400 euros.

3.- GeForce RTX 2070

I know it can sound strange, at last it is one of the most advanced graphics cards that exist due to the hybrid technique used, but it is a model that we will not buy. The reason is simple, it was in a complicated position after the arrival of the RTX 2060 Super.

The RTX 2070 is only slightly more powerful than the RTX 2060 Super, but the difference is so minimal that it can be surpassed by some overclocking. However, the first has a minimum price of almost 470 euros. As we said the second can be purchased by less than 400 euros, so the figures speak for themselves.

Specifications of the RTX 2070

  • TU104 GPU at 12 nm.
  • 2.304 shades at 1410 MHz-1.620 MHz, normal and peat mode.
  • 144 texture units.
  • 64 rasterized units.
  • 288 tensor cores.
  • 36 RT kernels
  • 256-bit bus
  • 8 GB of GDDR6 memory effective at 14 GHz.
  • You need a 8-pin connector.
  • 175 watts TDP

Alternative option that is worth buying: if we want to continue the NVIDIA side, the RTX 2060 Super is the best choice, because it has a price-rendered connection. much more balanced.

Isia efficiency is, mean, between 3% and 5% less than that of the RTX 2070, but it costs less than 70 euros. With it we can play without problems in 1440p and 4K if we reduce a bit the graphic quality.

Specifications of the RTX 2060 Super

  • Graphic core TU106 in 12 nm.
  • 2.176 shades at 1470 MHz-1650 MHz, normal and peat mode.
  • 136 texture units.
  • 64 rasterized units.
  • 256-bit bus
  • 8 GB of GDDR6 at 14 GHz.
  • 34 RT kernels
  • 272 Core Cores
  • Additional 8-pin connector.
  • 175 watts TDP

If you want an AMD option, do not hesitate, the Radeon RX 5700 XT I'm a safe bet. Exceedia performance exceeds around 2% the RTX 2070 and It costs less than 40 euros.

4.- GeForce GTX 1060 of 6 GB

Of course, the GTX 1060 was in its 6GB version one of the largest domains of average NVIDIA resources in the paschal generation, but time has passed and was defeated clearly with the new generation of the green giant, which, as many of our readers will know, uses the architecture of Turing.

With this graphic card we can play 1080p with maximum qualities and enjoy good fluency, though, peculiarly, the lack of optimization It is becoming more and more latent and we can no longer guarantee top quality and 60 fixed FPS in all games. However, this is not its main problem, the key that makes it a bad purchase that we have at the price, because the cheapest models about 215 euros, a figure too high for a graphic card that reached the market in 2016.

Specifications of the GTX 1060 6GB

  • Graphic core GP106 in 16 nm.
  • 1,280 shades at 1.506 MHz / 1,708 MHz
  • 80 textbooks.
  • 48 rasterized units.
  • 192-bit bus
  • 6 GB of effective GDDR5 at 8 GHz.
  • Requires a 6-pin connection.
  • TD of 120 watts.

Alternative option that is worth buying: The most appropriate for this budget is to go to GTX 1660, since we can find well-built models only 224.95 euros.

With it we will enjoy a truly optimal performance in 1080p (in crude power.) is close to GTX 1070) and virtually all the advantages of the architecture of Turing, with the unique exceptions of transfers and DLSS.

Specifications of the GTX 1660

  • Graphic core TU116 at 12 nm.
  • 1,408 shades at 1530 MHz-1785 MHz.
  • 88 texture units.
  • 48 rasterized units.
  • 192-bit bus
  • 6 GB of effective 8 GHz GDDR5 memory.
  • Additional 8-pin connector.
  • 120 watts TDP

In case we want an alternative to AMD, we can choose for Radeon RX 590, a graphic card between 5% and 10% slower (average) than the GTX 1660, although we can find it at a cheaper price: 207.85 euros.

5.- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

I was one of the graphics cards most required for its good performance consumption. With it we could enjoy a show similar to that proposed by the veteran GTX 960, but with TDP of just 75 watts. I do not need an additional electric connector or a great deal to work, so it is not strange that those users with low power sources have decided to buy the GTX 1050 Ti, at last it was one of the most effective graphics cards of their generation.

As in the case of the GTX 1060 the time has passed, and it has not dealt with the GTX 1050 Ti too well. The launch of Turing and the static prices left this graphic card in position sensignifa, because it costs 173,99 euros.

Specifications of the GTX 1050 Ti

  • Graphic core GP107 in 14 nm.
  • 768 shades at 1.291 MHz / 1.392 MHz.
  • 48 textbooks.
  • 32 rasterized units.
  • 128-bit bus
  • 4 GB of GDDR5 at 7 GHz efficient.
  • TDP 75 watts, without additional electronic connector.

Alternative option that is worth buying: la GTX 1650 It is the best option if we want to keep a balance on it consumption efficiency, because it offers an efficiency near the GTG 1060 of 3 GB but has a TDP of just 75 and no, does not require additional scanner.

The price of this graphic card varies depends on the attachment chosen, but we can find very interesting models of 169.90 euros.

Specifications of the GTX 1650

  • Graphic core TU117 at 12 nm.
  • 896 shades at 1485 MHz-1.665 MHz, normal and peat mode.
  • 56 units of texture.
  • 32 rasterized units.
  • 128-bit bus
  • 4 GDDR5 at 8 GHz.
  • TDP 75 watts, without additional electronic connector.

If we want an alternative to AMD Radeon RX 580 with 4 GB of Shapphire It is a good option for 149 euros, because it offers better performance and has a more affordable price, but we must consider that we lose this value according to the efficiency offered by the former, because it requires a very powerful electricity supply.

It's a good time to renew a graphic card

After a complicated phase, while the prices inflated too much the sector It was gradually stabilized. It is true that the situation is not yet fully standardized, but the arrival of the new generations of NVIDIA and AMD has been a bit demanded in the market.

Graphic solutions based on Passover offer very poor money, but Turing, Polaris and Navi they compensate this panorama remarkably. If we want to play with 1080p guarantees, we do not have to invest more than 200 euros in the graphics card, and we can aspire to play in 1440p with all the guarantees with a graphic card of less than 300 euros.

I'm convinced that this graphics card guide that is not worth buying you will help you get the clearest ideas, but to finish I want to leave you a small manuscript, which will serve as a reference for you to be clear what graphic card is the best choice in terms of price prices It depends on the resolution you want to play.

  • Less than 1080p: If we play at low resolutions, it is best to choose for the second hand market, because the current low rates have too high prices. One GTX 1050 or 4 GB RX 560 They are good options, while we'll find them for 50-60 euro maximum.
  • 1080p resolution: in this case the best money for money is offered by the AMD Radeon RX 570 and RX 580, because they have prices between 130 and 160 euros, according to the elector, and offer great performance. They also have excellent support for Vulcan and DirectX 12.
  • Resolution 1440p: In this case it is best to go for RTX 2060, a graphic card that offers a round value for what it costs. Round 300 euros, but I have seen occasional offers that fell below that figure.
  • 2160p resolution: la Radeon RX 5700 XT It is the one that offers the most balanced value at this level if we are talking about the price presentation. In games like Wolfenstein II, it has averages of more than 70 FPS with a high quality, and in others, RAGE 2 always has averages of more than 30 FPS with a high quality. These extremes confirm that it is capable of moving demanding games in such a resolution and that by reducing our quality, we can give a great boost to the average of frames by a second. Not bad for a graphic card that costs less than 430 euros.
[ad_2]
Source link