Starting this weekend that more black can not be for Facebook, Again at the center of the burning investigation in the New York Times, and subject to vulnerability that could compromise users' personal information: all without Zuckerberg deciding to participate in a special conversation on November 27, before 170 million users on the social network.
New York Times Has just posted a new, explosive, investigation On Facebook, based on the consultation of 50 witnesses, Members of the US Congress, government members, lobbyists, past and past directors of the company, whose purpose is to demonstrate how Facebook is He knew about some critical issues and did nothing, If not late, operating – on the contrary – screening lobby activity as a charge.
Specifically, the article explains that in Menlo Park was known Russian Interference In the US presidential election in 2016 at least a year, considering that already in 2015 the team of "Project propaganda"A follow-up group coordinated by Alex Stamos ex-discovered how Russia invested $ 100,000 in political media on social.In this case, Stamos was told to remain obscure in his reports posted on the network, and it was decided Do something only on September 6, 2017. In addition, the company was immediately aware of the entity of the company Cambridge Analytic, But he would have dubiously "fix it": while Zuckerberg travels around the world to apologize, promising improvements, his right arm (and Operational Manager) Cheryl Sandberg He used the media and the lobby Address the anger of people against OpponentsApple and Google), Fearing the longus manus of finances George & amp; Soros (For example, with a portfolio that underscored the financial ties between the company's open fund and the critical group "Freedom from Facebook") to prevent restrictive laws from being applied to them (eg, the Beautiful Ads Act). Needless to say this Facebook's response was not so sharp, With the admission that some problems occurred late but that, since then, much progress has been made. Strangely, however, it was only last March, when Tim Cook said that at least they would never compromise on the privacy of people, who are considered a fundamental right, Zuckerberg forced his team Do not use multiple Apple devices, Choice for Android.
If that was not enough, the New York Times showed how Facebook, guilt, Do not know what has become personal data of users, Used by smart phone manufacturers. As is known, at first, Facebook agreed with some companies (the first 7, then 10 in total) to combine the functions of photo sharing applications of the latter. A report required by PricewaterhouseCoopers from the US Federal Trade Commission – FTC – found that there is very little evidence to show that Facebook really checked that the behavior of these companies was compatible in terms of the utilization of personal data. A serious fact given that the report is in 2013, but in 2011 the agreement in which the FTC withdrew sanctions on Zuckerberg only trusts in protecting its privacy.
Another problem arose, then, thanks Security company Imperva, According to which Facebook was subordinate A bug that exposed him to attacks Request for forgery between sites (o CSRF) At the expense of users who, surfing with Chrome, They end up at sites at risk, being still connected to the social network. In this case, hacker, using iFrame, Can open a secondary card in the browser, from which can be run Targeted research on the victim's social network (Posts with a given term, & # 39; Likes & # 39; on specific pages or brands, photos, or markup in some places) Even if this information is determined as open friends only. The bug report in May, and immediately Facebook was activated with the patch but, being the inherent problem in other sites, from Manlo Park started the invitation to the browser developers to continue, also, the introduction of integrated prevention tools,
November 27, in Westminster An international committee is convened, headed by Canada and Britain, but also with the participation of Ireland, Argentina and Australia, who should have heard Zuckerberg Issues about incorrect information, Fake news, and Privacy. But it seems that the CEO of Facebook is unwilling to participate: considering what has just been discovered, with good knowledge of the facts.